Advocacy opportunities

Special Session Legislative Update

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

It has been quiet in Olympia lately. There are negotiations going on between budget writers, but the word is that there is still a great divide between the House and Senate. In order to pass a budget, they must bridge their differences on revenue and on which programs and services are funded. And we think it is a good thing that the special session is happening. To prevent it, the House would have had to cave to the Senate's horrific budget proposal. That would have been unacceptable. So we are thankful that the House along with the Governor are standing strong to demand significant revenue to fund their budget proposals. The negative talk in the media about "D.C.-style gridlock" misses the point and misleads the public about what is really going on. We invite you to join us in trying to reframe the situation. This will help encourage the House to stay strong and ease the pressure to go home before an acceptable compromise is reached. 

Meanwhile, many lawmakers are back home and some are available for meetings. This is a strategic time to schedule meetings and to explain our ask for the Housing Trust Fund (detailed below) and to advocate for the House's Operating Budget. Their budget restores the Senate's deep cuts to homelessness programs. Let us know if you'd like any assistance with these meetings. We are happy to help.

If meeting with your lawmaker isn't possible, there are many other valuable advocacy strategies you can engage in.

Writing a letter to the editor, engaging your board in advocacy by asking them to make calls at your next board meeting, compiling stories from your clients on the importance of your programs that are funded by the Consolidated Homeless Grant, etc. We have a lot of ideas. Just give us a call, and we can share more.

What's Next?

Special session is scheduled to end on June 11, but it isn't clear if they will reach agreement by then. There is another official revenue forecast due on June 20. Since it is expected to be relatively positive, some are speculating that lawmakers will wait until then to make final budget decisions. This might be a sensible decision since more revenue coming in means less of a deficit to fill. And, the longer they wait, the more time we have to advocate!

We will be sending out an action alert next week. Please pledge to take action and to ask your board, your staff, colleagues, members, and clients to join you. We need to keep pushing.

And I hope to see many of you on Tuesday, June 11 for our 25th Anniversary Awards Dinner. Our keynote is the esteemed Peter B. Edelman. You may remember when he resigned from the Clinton administration in 1996 to protest the harmful welfare reform policies being planned. As he predicted, welfare reform eroded the safety net and set our nation backwards. Join your fellow advocates to learn more, to debate, to celebrate, and to grow our movement. It will be a fun and lively evening! Tickets are still available, but going fast. Click here to secure your spot.

Reminder of the Current Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Ask

1) Bring the allocation up to the Governor’s level of $65 million and maintain the House's additional $28.5 million allocation for other affordable housing projects*. Put that money into a competitive pool that all projects on the alternate list can apply for.

*Other affordable housing in the House's budget includes the following; $28.5 million = $4.5 million for public housing authorities' preservation funds, $14 million for Sand Point Building 9, and $10 million for Energy Matchmakers.

2) Expand the alternate list to all viable projects.

3) Un-rank the alternate list.

Click here for a pdf copy of the Housing Alliance's letter to elected officials that outlines our HTF ask.


Click here to send an email to your legislators demanding they pass a budget that creates more opportunites for safe, healthy, affordable homes!

 


 

Reminder: We Walked Off the Fiscal Cliff...and We're Still Falling

Ben Miksch, State and Federal Policy Associate

You might have been hopeful when you heard the news earlier this week that Congress finally came together to do something about sequestration...and then have that turn to disappointment when you found they only passed a bill to ease air traffic delays while leaving the other much more brutal cuts in place. This inspired me to share the Coalition on Human Needs Weekly Sequestration Impact Reports. Every week they've been compiling lists of news articles about how sequestration is hurting people across the country. The article lists news stories of real people being impacted by the cuts, like the this one:

Virginia: Elmer Gilbert Winn, Jr., age 59, received a rental voucher from Fairfax authorities, but before he was able to find an apartment, they rescinded it as a result of sequestration cuts. Winn, who uses an oxygen tank and has had a collapsed lung four times, now pays $400 rent to a friend to sleep in the kitchen, out of his $710 in Social Security disability and $35 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program/food stamps. Before that, he was sleeping on the streets, something he is now too ill to do. But his friend has been hospitalized, and that means Winn may no longer be able to stay in his apartment.


A higher Congressional priority than caring for the elderly & disabled.

We continue to advocate that Congress address the entirety of sequestration, especially the parts are hurting our most vulnerable neighbors. In the meantime, you can read this week's latest Sequestration Impact Report here.

NPR also just produced an excellent story yesterday explaining how the federal sequester is reducing housing vouchers in every state, with some personal quotes from people who are homeless as a result. You can read/listen to it here: Sequester Puts Some Needing Housing Aid 'Back To Square One.

Just more reminders that sequestration is already resulting in more households being at risk of homelessness, which makes our budget fight in Olympia all the more important. If you haven't already, don't forget to take action now!

Measuring the Harm of the Senate Budget

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

If the Senate budget passes, state homelessness programs will be cut by 50%.

The legislature ended the regular session on Sunday, April 28, without a resolution on the budget. Governor Jay Inslee has announced that he’ll call them back into special session on Monday, May 13 to finish budget negotiations. There are significant differences between competing budget proposals and much at stake for people struggling with homelessness or housing insecurity. 

The Senate’s Operating Budget proposal, which passed out of their chamber with bipartisan votes, makes deep cuts to virtually every state homeless program:  

  • The Consolidated Homeless Grant (CHG), which funds emergency shelter, domestic violence shelters, provides rent assistance and more is cut by 50%.
  • The Aged, Blind, and Disabled (ABD) program, which provides modest cash assistance to people who are permanently disabled and unable to work is eliminated.
  • The Housing and Essential Needs (HEN) program, which provides rent and utility assistance to temporarily disabled people is cut by 57%.
  • Operations and Maintenance (O&M) support for affordable housing programs that serve extremely low income households exiting homelessness is eliminated. This is funding that helps pay for basic operations since the deeply affordable rent levels can’t provide enough to support day to day functions.
  • Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), which provides cash assistance and access to other childcare and vocational programs for very low income parents with dependent children is cut deeply cut.

In an extreme contrast, the House Operating Budget fully funds all these programs and adds a new program called “Ending Family Homelessness” which aims to end homelessness for households with children who are unsheltered or living in shelters and motels. Unlike the Senate’s all-cuts budget, the House avoided such devastating cuts by including revenue in their budget. The House’s proposed budget better matches our state’s values by protecting the safety net while also investing in public education.

Cuts to homelessness services are unacceptable at a time when so many in our state are struggling to leave homelessness behind or to keep a roof over their head. On any given night at least 20,000 of people in Washington are surviving outdoors or in temporary shelter. More than 27,000 public school students experienced homelessness last year. Many thousands more are living in deep poverty and paying more than they can afford for rent, leaving them extremely vulnerable to homelessness.

At a time when we need to do more to prevent and end homelessness, the Senate proposes to set us back even further. Enacting their budget would cause at least 20,500 more people to experience homelessness over the next two years.

Protecting services that prevent and end homelessness is impossible without enacting new revenue. Please tell your lawmakers that protecting the most vulnerable is more important than tax beaks for special interests.

 


 

The (Last) Week in Housing Advocacy

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

Session Ends

The session officially ended on the evening of Sunday, April 28, after 105 long days. But, since budgets are still not done, we'll need a special session for our elected officials to finish their business. Although many are decrying this special session as another example of “political gridlock,” the alternative would be reprehensible. With the Senate refusing to compromise on their budget proposal that slashes programs for affordable housing and homelessness, it is very good news that the House and the Governor are standing firm. And although the Senate’s “Majority Coalition Caucus” keeps saying that they were ready to go home long before Sunday, they seem to fail to recognize that stamping their feet and demanding that their cuts be enacted isn’t a very productive way reach a compromise. All last week, I heard a lot of political accusations of who is at fault for the lack of agreement. But regardless of who holds more or less fault, the special session presents an opportunity for extended advocacy. And that is a good thing.

 

More Time to Push our Lawmakers to Do the Right Thing

The Governor announced Sunday evening that he'll give the legislature a two-week break and then call them back on Monday, May 13. This presents an excellent opportunity for you to schedule an in-person meeting with your lawmakers while they are home. We urge you to consider calling your lawmaker to request a meeting while they are home. Start with their Olympia office and if they haven’t left instructions on the voicemail to call their home office, leave a message there. If your lawmaker is taking meetings during these two weeks, offer to host it at a building funded by the Housing Trust Fund or at an office where you administer Housing and Essential Needs services or at a shelter supported by Consolidated Homeless Grant dollars. This can help show your lawmakers the value of these programs. Additionally, consider writing a letter to the editor. A short message in your local paper urging lawmakers to enact revenue and to protect the safety net can go a long way. The Housing Alliance will soon be posting some helpful tips on our webpage. So, keep an eye out.

 

The Revenue Proposals in Play

Revenue is the key to a budget that both funds education and maintains the safety net. The Senate’s budget contained no new revenue, while both the House and the Governor are pushing a combination of revenue options including the closing of tax loopholes and making some temporary taxes permanent. It is critical that advocates for affordable housing and homelessness remain vocal on the need for revenue. To learn more about the proposals in play, please join us for a special member call on Thursday, May 2 at noon. During the this call, Housing Alliance lobbyist and lead coordinator of the Revenue Coalition Nick Federici will explain the revenue proposals, clarify how much they could bring in and how advocates can help make sure that they pass. Please RSVP by emailing me at michele@wliha.org and put “RSVP for May 2nd Revenue Call” in the subject line. We'll send you the phone number once you’ve RSVP'd.
Nick Federici

 

A Special Thank You

This has been a long, hard session. And we’ve got more work to do! But it's important to recognize the accomplishments that your advocacy won this session. The passage of the Fair Tenant Screening Act (SSB 5568), of Foster Care to 21 (E2SSB 5405), and of the 72-hour youth shelter notification rule (SB 5147) are significant accomplishments that everyone should be proud of. Additionally, many bills that would have been extremely bad for Washington’s tenants were stopped. Advocacy isn’t always fun, but it's always necessary. Thank you for standing up repeatedly and please stick with us over this two-week break and then into the special session. We can’t let the Senate’s proposed cuts to affordable housing and homelessness programs get enacted. And only advocacy is going to prevent it.

We won’t be sending out weekly summaries during the special session, but we'll be alerting you to significant developments via our blog, Facebook, and Twitter. And of course we'll continue to share strategic opportunities to take action.

Thank you for advocating with us!


Governor Jay Inslee signing Part 2 of the Fair Tenant Screening Act into law.

 


 

Board Advocacy from Coast to Coast

Ben Miksch, State and Federal Policy Associate

A totally neat thing happened to Rachael Myers and me at the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) Policy Conference in Washington, D.C. a few weeks ago, but we've been so wrapped up analyzing and advocating around the House and Senate budget releases that we haven't had a chance to share it with you.

So let me take a minute to fix that!

This was on the second day of the conference. Rachael and I were attending a lunch plenary in a ballroom filled with many people who work at organizations similar to the Housing Alliance in other states across the country. Right as we sat down, two advocates from New Jersey looked at Rachael's nametag and then gasped. One of the women looked at Rachael and said, "You're the group from Washington right? You're the group that does the Board Advocacy Project?"

I won't lie, my jaw dropped. And Rachael was pretty amazed as well. It turned out these two women had realized the power of board advocacy all the way on the other side of the country. They had been looking for resources for how to get their own board engaged and had stumbled upon our Board Advocacy Project video. They'd been inspired and had taken the video back to their board. And now we've got one more nonprofit board getting involved in advocacy.

The project is spreading throughout Washington as well. It often starts with just one board member taking action on email alerts. Then they start forwarding those email alerts to other board members, who start taking action as well. Before you know, it the board has formed an advocacy committee and has included advocacy requirements in the board member job description. Soon they are setting aside time during board meetings to strategize and plan for their upcoming advocacy efforts. Meanwhile, one of those board members joins a second board and brings that advocacy fire with them. And the whole process starts again.

I talked to a woman recently who was very interested in getting her board involved in advocacy. She had a friend who was in the same position. They told me about an ingenious plan they'd devised where each would join the other's board. That way they'd both each have an advocacy partner on the two boards. This is all it takes to kindle the advocacy fire for the whole board. I think it's brilliant.

As part of this effort, the Housing Alliance is working on a two-pronged approach. For boards or board members that are just getting started on this process, we have been offering tailored trainings about what advocacy is, why you should be doing it, and how to start advocating today.

For boards and organizations that are already involved in advocacy, we've been providing legislative updates to tie folks back into opportunities to take action.

If you're interested in either, feel free to reach out to me at benm@wliha.org or really anyone else here at the Housing Alliance and we'll get you set up with what you need.

Ensuring that everyone in Washington has the opportunity to live in a safe, healthy, affordable home is going to take all of us working together. That means board members, but it also means nonprofit staff, community members, volunteers, people who have or are currently experiencing homelessness, and legislators too.

Let's build the movement!

 


 

 

Why Our Budget Matters

Guest Blogger: Doug McKeehen, Program Manager at Michael’s Place

 

As a social service provider who used to be homeless myself, I’m really worried about what the state budget for this biennium could look like. I can’t believe that if the Senate gets its way, homelessness programs will be hobbled by losing more than half their current funding. Several years ago, the very programs that are at risk of being drastically cut or eliminated this year saved my own life. After years of employment in the construction field, I became unable to work due to increasing health issues and pain. I fell into a deep depression, and my attempts to self-medicate led me into severe drug and alcohol addiction. I ended up homeless and spent several months living on the streets or in the shelters.

Back then, as now, there was a social safety net in place. The safety net programs were absolutely essential to my ability to turn my life around. That assistance allowed me to get help for my physical disabilities and get medication and treatment for my depression. I was able to get counseling for my addiction issues. I eventually got accepted into a transitional housing facility where I could continue to work on my sobriety and become more stable. Eventually, I moved into subsidized permanent housing, where I became stable enough to once again become fully employed. Until I became employed, there was a small money grant that allowed me to take care of my most basic needs.

The cuts that have been proposed by the Senate this year will completely eliminate or drastically cut every single program that saved my life at every single step of my journey back to independence and health. Had these cuts happened ten years ago, I would probably not be alive today.

I’m profoundly grateful that these programs funded by the State of Washington were there to help me. That’s why I’ve told my legislators (and I’m going to tell them again) that I’m counting on them to make sure that the final budget adequately funds the Housing Trust Fund, Housing and Essential Needs program, Aged Blind and Disabled program, and other programs that meet people’s most basic needs. I let them know that these programs have saved lives, including mine, and that it is important to me that they continue to do so.

I hope you’ll join me in working to keep these priorities front and center in the state budget negotiations.

----
Editor's Note:
You can join Doug in sending an essential message to your legislators before the clock runs out on this session. Click here to go to our TAKE ACTION page, and tell the legislature to invest in homes for low-income families and individuals and also to protect services that help people meet their most basic needs. Then send the link on to five of your friends, family, or co-workers. We must end this legislative session with an advocacy bang!

 


 

The Week in Housing Advocacy

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

Policy Bill Advocacy Winding Down

Last week brought the session’s final cutoff for policy bills. All policy bills that are not necessary to implement the budget are now either on their way to the Governor or dead until next year. Many bills that made the long journey of passing their own chamber got all the way to the floor of the other chamber, only to die on the last day. But they will be alive in 2014 to start the process over again. To see where all of our priorities and support items landed, check out our Bill Tracker.

With less than one week left of session (the last day is scheduled for Sunday, April 28), it's now all about the budget and revenue. To protect our priorities and to win investments in affordable housing and homelessness programs, everything hinges on how much revenue the House and the Governor’s office can get the Senate to agree to. Less revenue = more cuts. It really is that simple.

 

Take Action! This Last Week is Critical

Advocates need to keep getting messages to lawmakers to tell them that the final budget must adequately fund the Housing Trust Fund (HTF); Housing & Essential Needs (HEN) program; and Aged, Blind, & Disabled (ABD) program and restore all the cuts within the Senate’s budget.

Don’t forget, if the Senate has their way, our state will enact deep cuts to every affordable housing and homelessness program we have. The Consolidated Homeless Grants that fund emergency, youth, and domestic violence shelters; rent assistance; and more would be cut by 50%. HEN would be cut by 57% and ABD eliminated. The HTF received just $35 million, when the need is so much greater. So we must stay engaged and repeatedly urge our lawmakers to match the House Operating Budget and to match the Governor’s HTF allocation of $65 million. Please take action today and ask others to join you.

 

What’s Next?

Although technically possible, it's unlikely that our lawmakers will be able to reach agreement on the budget before session ends on the 28th. If they are not able, the Governor will likely call a special session. A 2/3 majority vote by both chambers of the legislature can also establish a special session, but tradition established over the last several years has the Governor taking the action. Special sessions can last thirty days at a time, and if the budget isn’t finished in that time, another one can be called. If we do run into a special session, it's rumored the Governor may give lawmakers a brief break before calling them back. If so, this break may present a great opportunity for advocacy when your lawmakers are back home. Stay tuned for more news on this.

 

Federal Advocacy Update

While the budget and revenue debates rage on in our state, they're also a central focus in D.C. That's why the federal budget also continues to be front and center for our advocacy efforts.

At the end of March, Congress passed a budget deal to take us through October. Advocates were able to secure some small increases for public housing and McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Grants. However, as for the rest of the budget, it was as if someone took the Fiscal Year 2012 budget, crossed out "2012" and wrote in "2013." On top of that, Congress also failed to end sequestration. This means that right now the $85 billion in across-the-board cuts are winding their way through the complicated federal budget pipeline and seeping into our communities. The national organization Coalition for Human Needs has been tracking the effects of sequestration. And all is not well.

Advocates are now turning their attention to the Fiscal Year 2014 budget, which gives us a chance to undo some of these cuts and increase funding for the programs we need to build affordable housing and end homelessness in our communities. President Obama just released his budget last week: an end to sequestration, big increases for homeless assistance, undoing cuts to Section 8 and public housing, continued support for the Veteran Administration's homeless programs, and $1 billion for the National Housing Trust Fund.

Despite the good news for affordable housing and homelessness programs in the President's budget, it's a long road from a proposal to actually passing a budget. Advocates will need to continue staying active and involved and fighting for the programs that serve the most vulnerable in our communities. We also need to be thinking creatively to find new sources of federal funding for affordable housing programs. For example, the National Low Income Housing Coalition's United For Homes campaign, would redesign the Mortgage Interest Deduction and fully fund the National Housing Trust Fund. It's a great example of new and creative thinking. We recommend you check it out.

 

Further Reading

For a more in-depth examination of the budget proposals, the National Alliance to End Homelessness and the National Low Income Housing Coalition are both great resources.


 

 


 

The Week in Housing Advocacy

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

The Battle of the Budgets

With just a couple of weeks of the regular session left, the budget battle has intensified. The House released both their Operating and Capital Budgets last week, and they couldn’t be further from the Senate. The House’s inclusion of revenue, primarily from the closing of costly corporate tax breaks, allowed them more room to make deep investments in K-12 education (as required by the State Supreme Court’s McCleary Decision), while still investing in the safety net. Contrast this to the senate’s budget that didn’t close one tax loophole and instead relied on deep cuts to affordable housing and homelessness programs to balance their budget. The senate’s budget would cause at least 20,000 more people to experience homelessness. While the House budget maintains current investment levels in the Housing and Essential Needs program; the Aged, Blind, & Disabled program; Consolidated Homeless Grants; and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF).

You can read more about the Operating Budget and the differences between the House and Senate budgets here.

The Washington State Budget and Policy Center has this overview of the revenue that the House included in their budget.

 

Take Budget Action (Updated)

Now that both chambers have released their budgets, and the Governor has released his budget priorities, negotiations will start in earnest. These negotiations will be led by budget writers and majority party leaders and will largely take place behind closed doors.

But advocates like you have a powerful role. We have to push the House and the Senate to do the right thing and raise their Housing Trust Fund allocations to match the Governor's. It is important to take action again and again until the budget is signed. So please start your week off right by getting to a phone and clicking this link with our updated advocacy message to our legislators.

 

Housing Trust Fund Update

Over the past several weeks, hundreds of you have taken action to make sure the House continued to invest in the Housing Trust Fund. And although we were disappointed to see the House’s Capital Budget allocating just $51.5 million for the Housing Trust Fund, your advocacy made sure it wasn’t zero. And your advocacy can give us a chance of bringing up that allocation to match the Governor’s request of $65 million. Take action today, and keep standing by for more updates.

Here is how the House Capital budget breaks down for the Housing Trust Fund and affordable housing:

 • $51.5 million for the Housing Trust Fund. Allocations are limited to the projects named in this list, which allocates the following to these categories:
          ◦ $27.050 million for farmworker housing (11 projects named)
          ◦ $9.367 million for housing for homeless vets (6 projects named)
          ◦ $6.064 million for housing for people with chronic mental illness (3 projects named)
          ◦ $9.019 million for housing for people with developmental disabilities (10 projects named)

 • $4.5 million for public housing authorities to preserve 5 project-based buildings with expiring contracts. The appropriation is solely for the following projects:
          ◦ Charter House ($777,000)
          ◦ Emerson Manor ($829,000)
          ◦ Naches House ($1.065 million)
          ◦ Wenatchee House ($1.173 million)
          ◦ Harbor House ($656,000)

 • $14 million was allocated for one project (Building 9) in Seattle's Sand Point neighborhood. The funds will rehab an existing building and convert it to affordable housing.

 • $70 million in total was allocated for affordable housing. Note: earlier reports included an additional allocation for mental health beds that was put in Commerce's budget, but this has been clarified to not be for affordable housing, hence the adjusted number.

 • Additionally, $10 million was allocation for Energy Matchmakers. These funds are for weatherizing homes occupied by low-income households.

 

A Win for Tenants!

While the budget battle raged, the Fair Tenant Screening Act (SSB 5568) humbly continued its progress and won an astonishing unanimous vote on the House floor on Friday. Representative Steve O’Ban (R-28th) was joined by Representative Derek Stanford (D-1st), the prime sponsor of the House version (SHB 1529) in standing to urge their fellow elected officials to join them in voting yes. This bill has had a long journey and will soon be enacted into law when the Governor signs it. There are many thank yous to elected officials to go around. And since it passed both chambers unanimously, we all can simply thank our senator and representatives for voting yes on SSB 5568 and standing up to protect tenants. You can add this to your budget message when you call the hotline today: 1-800-562-6000.

Although we still have more progress to make in order to fully eliminate the barriers to housing that tenant screening reports create, take a moment to be proud. Because of your advocacy, more people will be able to find a safe, healthy, and affordable home due to closure of the discrimination loophole against survivors of domestic violence.

 

Time is Running Out...

Lastly, we hope you will be joining us at our 23rd Annual Conference on Ending Homelessness. The discounted registration rate ends today, Monday, April 15. So stop procrastinating. Sign up here before it is too late.


Time to speak out and take action on our state budget!

 


 

 

Our Take on the Senate and the House Budgets

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

First, Take Action

Call your Senators. Get your phone ready and then click here. You'll be directed to a page with a concise advocacy script for your Senator with the message that the Senate needs to match the House budget for funding affordable housing and homelessness programs.

House and Senate Budget Details

Special thanks to Statewide Poverty Action Network for their Senate budget analysis on Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) and Laurie Lippold with Partners for Our Children for her House budget analysis on TANF.

Consolidated Homeless Grants (CHG)

The CHG are the state's primary funding to the counties for various homeless housing services. Administered by the Department of Commerce, these fund such programs as domestic violence shelters, transitional housing for families, and short-term rent assistance.
Senate budget cuts 
Consolidated Homeless Grants by 50 percent, causing an additional 11,500 people to experience homelessness.
House budget preserves funding for CHG.

Housing and Essential Needs (HEN)

HEN provides emergency rent and utility assistance (paid directly to the landlord) and provides access to basic needs like hygiene products and bus tokens through an Essential Needs Bank.
Senate cuts HEN
, yet its caseload (amount of people eligible) is expanded. But the budget only provides 43 percent of the funds needed to serve this vulnerable population. The caseload expansion includes 35 percent of the disabled individuals currently receiving cash through the Aged, Blind, and Disabled program (see below).
House preserves funding for HEN.

Aged, Blind, and Disabled (ABD)

Senate eliminates ABD, effective July 1, 2013. This means approximately 22,000 disabled people across the state receiving the $197 cash benefit will have this small, but critical benefit terminated. They will be eligible for Housing and Essential Needs if they are homeless or at great risk of homelessness (and the Senate assumes that 35% will be), but HEN is significantly reduced and will not even be able to continue serving the current eligible population.
House preserves funding for ABD.

SSI Facilitation and Incapacity Examinations

Senate cuts funding for incapacity evaluations and SSI facilitations. Beginning July 1, 2015, the state will stop providing facilitation services that move clients to Social Security Insurance (SSI) and will no longer conduct the incapacity examinations used to determine eligibility for SSI facilitation. It's believed that the intention is to provide facilitation services only for those already currently receiving them and to cap the program to prevent any additional clients.
House preserves funding for incapacity evaluations and SSI facilitations.

The Housing Trust Fund (HTF)

Senate allocates $35 million to the Housing Trust Fund. The Senate Budget redirects $2.5 million in Housing Trust Fund loan repayments to the General Fund. SSB 5895 eliminates deposits to the HTF from the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) and redirects those deposits to the Education Legacy Trust Account for funding education. Currently the REET is one of a couple Housing Trust Account revenue sources. This bill would eliminate this one source and redirect it permanently. As of January 2013, REET was projected to be approximately $950,000 in 2013-15 Biennium.
House allocates $71 million to affordable housing including the $55.55 million to the Housing Trust Fund in the Capital Budget.

Operations and Maintenance Funds (O&M)

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds support projects serving very low-income populations (<30% area median income). Because such projects charge little or no rent, supplemental income is needed to ensure that they can operate. The state provides small, but critical, O&M contracts to a number of projects across the state. The contracts are funded via a portion of real estate document recording fee revenue. Currently O&M provides operating subsidies to 67 projects serving high-need populations across the state. Projects supported include emergency shelters, transitional housing, seasonal farmworker, group homes, and multi-family projects serving households with special needs and extremely low incomes.

Senate eliminates Operating and Maintenance Funds (O&M) and sweeps them to the General Fund. That change is likely to result in the closure of nonprofit homeless and domestic violence shelters and other community assets that support some of the most vulnerable people in our state. It also could also risk the viability of some projects currently applying for HTF dollars.
House preserves funding for O&M.

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF)

TANF provides temporary cash and medical help for families in need. Some families participate in the WorkFirst Program, which helps participants find and keep employment. Another program to know is Working Connections Child Care (WCCC), which helps families with low incomes pay for child care while they work or meet WorkFirst participation requirements.

TANF Money Swept to General Fund

The $143,918,000 in TANF and Working Connection Childcare (WCCC) caseload underspend funds were transferred to the state general fund. It is important to understand that the origins of this underspend are due to the caseloads being artificially suppressed by budget cuts and policy changes that have been made over the past several years*. This has occurred while family and child poverty has increased and deepened during the Great Recession; these funds should instead be used to restore deep cuts that have made it difficult for TANF families to meet their basic survival needs.

*If you were following conversations about the Governor’s proposal for a new Rapid Re-Housing Program, you may note that the program depended on some of the TANF underspend for funding.
Senate budget does not include the Rapid Re-Housing Program.

House sweeps some of these funds to General Fund, 
but also re-invests some in projects such as the Rapid Re-Housing Program. 

Assistance Will Not Adjust with Family Size

Senate cuts $2,708,000 from TANF by creating a "family cap policy." This policy freezes a family's cash grant amount to their family size at entrance of the TANF program. This means that if they have additional children while on TANF, their cash grant is not increased. This will make it more difficult for parents to meet their children's basic needs and is an anti-child and anti-family policy.
House does not include a "family cap policy."

Services to TANF Families Reduced

Senate cuts $14,526,000 from TANF by reducing funding to WorkFirst partners by 10%. These WorkFirst partners provide much needed services to help stabilize families. These services include domestic violence support services to address family violence, barrier removal services (such as mental health treatment), education and job training, and job search support. Without access to these services, it is very difficult for TANF families to move out of poverty into employment.
House does not include this WorkFirst partners funding cut.

Working Connections Child Care Cut

Senate reduces the Working Connection Child Care cap from 33,000 slots to 29,000 slots. The WCCC is projected to reach the 33,000 cap by the end of biennium due to administrative improvements that have streamlined the application process and improved access. Low-income parents depend on subsidized childcare in order to be able to enter and succeed in the labor market. Without this support, many parents will be unable to afford to work due to the high cost of childcare.
We are still in the process of analyzing the House Budget’s TANF expenditures.

TANF Contingency Funds Cut

The budget cuts $33,817,000 in federal TANF contingency funds. Washington State received these funds because of our high poverty rate. TANF has been cut by $385,000,000 since 2009 and an additional $200,000,000 in funding has been swept to the general fund. We should restore deep cuts that have hurt families rather than transferring much needed resources out of TANF.
We are still in the process of analyzing the House Budget’s TANF expenditures.

TANF Redesign Cut

Senate budget cuts $4,073,000 in caseload savings from the TANF redesign process. The TANF redesign process, which was intended to improve services to TANF families in order to accelerate their pathway out of poverty, will only succeed if it is adequately funded. Reducing funding will limit essential services that help TANF families succeed.
House budget does not include a cut from a TANF redesign.

Washington Families Fund (WFF)

WFF is a private/public partnership that funds innovative programs around the state focused on transitioning homeless families into stable housing.
The Senate budget originally did not include funding for the WFF, but Senator Nelson introduced an amendment in Senate Ways and Means Committee on Thursday (the 4th) to add the program back into the budget. The amendment passed and would fund it at $5.3 million. However, the funds to pay for the program are redirected from other homeless programs. While we are grateful and encouraged that law makers see the importance of the WFF, this funding source is not ideal. We will continue to work with our partners and our legislative champions to advocate for new dollars for this important program.
House funds the WFF at $2 million from existing Commerce funds. Although we are happy they are looking to support such an important fund, we will continue to seek General Fund appropriations.

We will adjust and update this analysis as more information comes in, posting to Twitter and Facebook when we update our analysis.


Time to speak out and take action on the Senate's budget! Click here to send a message.

 


 

 

The Week in Housing Advocacy

Michele Thomas, Director of Policy and Advocacy

The Senate's Budget

Last week was dominated by the release of the Senate’s budget, which cuts affordable housing and homelessness programs by 52%.

Last Tuesday, at around 9:30pm, the Senate suddenly announced they were going to release the budget the next afternoon and then hold a hearing on it right after. When the budget was finally released near 1:00pm on Wednesday, it left only a little over two-and-a-half hours to read it before the 3:30pm hearing. Despite the outrageously short notice, six Housing Alliance members were able to rush down and testify on the deep cuts to the Housing and Essential Needs (HEN) program and on the elimination of the Aged, Blind, and Disabled (ABD) program:

Thanks to our testifiers: Greg Winter from the Whatcom Homeless Service Center in Bellingham; Jennifer Milton and Kate Stragis from Community Action of Skagit County; Alison Eisinger from the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness; Ania Beszterda-Alyson from the Low Income Housing Institute; and Robin Koskey of Building Changes.

Do you have comments of your own on the budget? Join our action to send letters to the editor to share why you think the safety net should be funded. Email our Community and Member Organizer Alouise Urness at alouise@wliha.org to learn more.

Read our previous blog post for our breakdown of the deep cuts to affordable housing and homelessness programs in the Senate budget.

The Senate passed the budget out of committee on Thursday and then passed it off the floor on Friday night, 30 to 18. Many good amendments that would have restored cuts to homelessness and affordable housing programs failed to make it onto the budget. Senator Jeannie Darneille (27th-Tacoma) introduced three amendments – one to restore the deep cuts to the Consolidated Homeless Grant, one to restore the cuts to HEN and ABD, and another to eliminate a cruel cut to the TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) grant, in which the family’s grant is capped at their initial family size when first seeking TANF assistance, instead of growing with the family.

Senator Darneille summed up the hard budget week:

This is not the final budget and not the final product. I am counting on my former colleagues in the House of Representatives to have compassion for the least among us. I am counting on them to correct the wrongs that were included in this budget and am counting on them to stand up for women, children, the vulnerable, and the disabled in all our communities.

The Time for Action is Now

Budget writers and leaders in the Majority Coalition Caucus have been characterizing the budget as “protecting the most vulnerable” and as “what Washington wants.” Help us tell your lawmakers that this budget isn’t what you want and that a 52% cut to programs that prevent and end homelessness is far from protecting the most vulnerable. Click here to quickly and easily send a message to your legislators in both houses that this budget is not what Washington wants. 

And if you are one of the many who have already taken action with our alert, please click here to urge others to join you by sending them the above link. Action this week couldn’t be more critical. 

 

How Did Your Senator Vote?

ESSB 5034
Operating budget 2013-2015
Senate vote on 3rd Reading & Final Passage
4/5/2013

Yeas: 30   Nays: 18   Absent: 0   Excused: 1


Photo Credit: Alan Cordova

Voting Yea:  Senators Bailey, Baumgartner, Becker, Benton, Braun, Brown, Dammeier, Eide, Ericksen, Fain, Fraser, Hargrove, Hatfield, Hewitt, Hill, Hobbs, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, King, Litzow, Mullet, Nelson, Parlette, Pearson, Rivers, Roach, Schoesler, Sheldon, Smith, and Tom
Voting Nay:  Senators Billig, Chase, Cleveland, Conway, Darneille, Frockt, Harper, Hasegawa, Keiser, Kline, Kohl-Welles, McAuliffe, Murray, Padden, Ranker, Rolfes, Schlicher, and Shin
Absent:  n/a
Excused:  Senator Carrell

 

The Fair Tenant Screening Act Advances

The budget release shadowed out the movement that the Fair Tenant Screening Act made last week. SSB 5568 was voted unanimously out of the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday morning, clearing last week’s policy deadline with just one day to spare. We appreciated the efforts of Representatives Jamie Pedersen (43rd-Seattle) and Steve O’Ban (28th-Pierce County) to strengthen the bill by adding a penalty if a screening company violated it. In the end, no amendment was added to the bill in order to ensure that it wouldn’t get killed in the Senate. It is now in House Rules Committee and needs to be voted on the House Floor by Wednesday, April 17 in order to make its way to the Governor for signature. Stay tuned for an action request if it looks like anything threatens it from proceeding to the next step.

 

Housing Alliance in the News

Last Tuesday, we also held a safety net press conference with our friends at the Statewide Poverty Action Network to highlight the importance of Housing and Essential Needs program; the Aged, Blind, and Disabled program; the Housing Trust Fund (HTF); TANF; and the Washington Families Fund (WFF). Speakers shared how important these programs have been for themselves and their families and how the programs successfully transitioned them out of homelessness. The Olympian covered the press conference with this detailed article here.


 

Our State's Communities Threatened Further by Federal Cuts

Lastly, as the intensity and urgency of the fight to fund state homelessness programs grows, the impacts of federal cuts are becoming clearer. For a new analysis of how sequestration is going to result in more homelessness and poverty, see the newest article in The Nation’s "Week in Poverty" series, an interview with Doug Rice from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. It provides a stark perspective on how critical it is that our state not add more cuts on top of the deep ones sequestration is already bringing.

As our state and federal elected officials engage in budget debates, it is critical that we continue to join together. Over the last week, over 1,400 messages were sent to state elected officials. We need you to keep the pressure up. Our advocacy is the only thing that will ensure that we end the session with the resources our state needs to continue making progress at preventing and ending homelessness and eliminating poverty. Please stay tuned for timely updates and opportunities to speak up.

 


 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Advocacy opportunities